Find your EU AI Act gaps — not just your risk tier
Most free checkers tell you if your AI system is high-risk. AI Act Gap tells you which technical pillars you’re missing and exactly what to build to fix them.
Start free assessment →How is this different?
Built for technical teams
Questions map to the specific artifacts Articles 9–17 and 53–55 require — verified against the final published text of Regulation EU 2024/1689, not legal summaries or paraphrases.
Role-aware from step one
Provider or Deployer? Your obligations differ — and if you’ve modified or rebranded a third-party AI system, you may be a Provider under Article 25 without knowing it. The assessment checks this and branches accordingly.
A report you can actually use
Export a PDF with gaps, article references, and recommended actions. Share it with your legal team or board.
Check your readiness — free, no login required
10–15 minutes. Covers EU AI Act Articles 9–17 (high-risk), Articles 53–55 (GPAI), and Article 25 reclassification. Verified against Regulation EU 2024/1689. No data stored about you.
Who are you?
The EU AI Act imposes different obligations depending on your role and system type. Select the options that best describe your situation.
Your role
This tool covers Providers and Deployers. If you are a distributor (Article 24), importer (Article 23), product manufacturer, or authorised representative, your obligations may differ. Consult the EU AI Act directly or seek qualified legal advice.